THE SOUL

 

 

The Christian religion thinks itself to be very clever when it says we have immortal souls which are purely spiritual entities, entities without parts.  A soul is like a circle whose centre is everywhere and whose circumference is nowhere.  It is one substance which has no parts or components but which is self-sufficient.  It is only beings that have bits and pieces that are not self-sufficient for they depend on things to protect them and on forces to hold them together. 

 

            If a spirit is love then it is wholly love.  If a spirit is cruel then it is wholly cruel.  The spirit is a power that is perfectly one because it is partless.  For it to be a mixture of qualities would meant that it has some power to be bad and some to be good or some to be clever and some to be stupid or whatever.  That is impossible for it is one power.  The ability of the spiritual soul is not something that is distinct from its awareness but is its awareness.  So, if you are a soul and think of a picture at one moment and a dog in the next there is not one consciousness but two.  It follows that every moment and every time you have a new thought you are becoming a new person.  The person who thinks of the picture is not the person who contemplates the dog.

 

            You are only conscious of the present moment and you don’t know for sure if you were really conscious a second ago for you could just be tapping into a reservoir of memory from the preceding consciousness if you think you can remember being you.  If you came into existence a second ago complete with a memory you would not know.  Thus, if you have a soul there is no proof that you are not changing into another person every second.   My memory is a sense.  It is the power to sense that you experienced the past.

 

            The doctrine of a spiritual soul leads to these shocking conclusions.  The doctrine tells us that God cannot exist because there is no point in him sending or permitting suffering when one person is just replacing another inside each body.  The person lives but a moment and is annihilated.  The substance is used to create a new person.

 

            The person who falls asleep dies and somebody else rises up in the morning.  Buddhism says you are seven things.  Consciousness is one of them.  Are you a person when you are asleep and not dreaming?  Think about that.  Is it murder to kill a sleeping person?  Buddhism teaches that since you are a collection of seven things and none of them is you but together they make you you that you doesn't really exist.  In their idea, if you think of a car as a unit you will make the mistake of thinking the car exists.  It does not for its a collection of parts.  Its just a bundle you put a label on.  In the same way, for Buddhists, the label person is just a name you give to a bundle of seven things.  It would seem that if you are a soul then the soul is essentially consciousness and is dead when you are asleep.  It must be immoral to fall asleep. 

 

        Religion teaches that life is absolutely valuable.  They reason that this is so because it is stupid to say that happiness should be promoted if persons are not important.  To say happiness should be worked for is to say that human life is more important than happiness.  If that is true then though you are alive when you are asleep your consciousness is dead if you are not dreaming.  Life is no good without consciousness.  So it is conscious human life not just human life that is valuable.  Falling asleep then is murder and denying the value of life.  Its wrong to take a nap for you can do without a nap.

 

            The doctrine of a spiritual soul is deadly indeed and is as absurd as it is evil.

 

            TEACH YOURSELF PHILOSOPHY OF MIND, Mel Thompson, Teach Yourself Books, London, 2003 seems to offer evidence that immaterial or non-material souls do exist.

_______________________________________

           

It mentions Plato’s thought in Timaeus that the psyche is self-moving.  Plato saw the psyche as the power to move things without being controlled by the physical.  When the psyche goes away from the body only a corpse is left (page 7).  Plato then thought that the soul pre-dated the body.  It was like it went into the body and controlled it and when it left the body was just an object, a dead thing. 

 

REPLY: Things move without being moved by anything conscious.  The psyche could have hidden physical forces that make it move.  To say that the consciousness gives life to the body and that something goes away from the body when it dies is as silly as saying that something goes away from a clockwork toy when it stops moving around.

 

_______________________________________

           

            A surgeon replaces your entire body with new parts.  You will still be the same person.  The soul is the form.  It makes you, you. The form is something that doesn’t depend on what parts you have got.  Form is what makes you what you are.  It defines your essence (page 13).

 

            REPLY: This might only work if the surgeon doesn’t do it all at the one time.  But consider this.  There is John and there is Simon.  If a surgeon puts Simon’s leg on John and soon John is entirely replaced by Simon’s parts, the result will not be John but Simon.  All you will have done is taken Simon apart and reassembled him in the operating theatre where John was.

 

 

_______________________________________

           

 

            Most philosophers believe that mind and body are real and that dualism is true but how the mind works the body is a matter of debate (page 20).  However it is possible to be a dualist without holding that mind and body are totally separate (page 43).

 

            REPLY: There is a link between mind and matter in the sense that if your brain is damaged you can become like a different person.  This makes it possible that mental states are ultimately physical forces caused by the brain.  We cannot explain matter for there is so much we cannot understand.  So why should the mind and exactly what it is be clear to us?

 

_______________________________________

           

 

            You can close your eyes and try to imagine that consciousness doesn’t exist but you will fail.  This is because thinking or consciousness is an experienced process.  The problems for mind body philosophies are the questions of,

Does this process have a physical origin?

            Is it a substance?

            How does it relate to the world of matter?

            Can it do anything? (page 31).

 

            REPLY: The last point is concerned with the fact that consciousness in itself does nothing at all.  It is like the idea that you have a body equipped with the faculties of reasoning and free will and the consciousness needs them to do stuff.  By itself it can do nothing.  The body impulses force the consciousness to look at the television for example.  It does nothing but is just controlled by the faculties and impulses of the body it is tied up with.

 

            None of the questions can be answered conclusively by saying that the consciousness is some kind of non-physical thing.

 

            The fact that an eye can see does not prove to the eye that sight exists.  There could be an eye that can’t see anything for there is nothing but darkness but which would be able to see things if it had light.  This eye will not know that sight exists.  So the eye will not know what it is.  It will not know if it is spirit or matter.  The argument that the consciousness is separate from the body because it is like an eye that can see itself and so is supernatural is wrong.

 

 

_______________________________________

           

 

            Consciousness or awareness is what responds to information and processes it (page 80).  If this is so, then everything has some level of awareness.  The thermometer for example is aware of temperature (page 81).  For something to have a mind it must have the power to intend.

 

            REPLY:  But consciousness by itself may simply be aware.  It is things we are conscious of that do the processing not the consciousness itself.  For example, with brain damage a person may not be able to reason anymore but they are still conscious.  Their consciousness is intact.  It has only lost some resources outside of itself. 

 

_______________________________________

           

 

            Plato taught that all true knowledge was a matter of memory or remembering (page 84).  Plato held that there are things in the mind that we know and ideas that we have before we experience them and based an argument for reincarnation on that (page 84).  It has been argued against Plato that if ideas are implanted in me, then how do I know they are real?

 

            REPLY:  The ideas could be implanted without reincarnation.  If I see a pink ball that does not prove that there is a pink ball there.  Insane people think God is their poached egg with equal conviction.

 

_______________________________________

           

 

            Sartre argued that consciousness is always consciousness of something so it is not an entity in itself (page 146).  Consciousness is total emptiness in the sense that it senses all things but itself.  Once you try to become aware of your own consciousness, you are trying to see it as a thing and it isn’t a thing.  You are trying to make an entity, an object and a thing out of what is subjectivity or non-thing which is impossible.  Consciousness is the same as an eye that can see everything but itself.     

 

            REPLY:  If you cut off all the senses, consciousness would be aware of nothing except that it is aware.  Consciousness is awareness and sensation.  It is a sense that the five senses feed data to.  It does sense itself.

 

Conclusion

 

There is no reason to think that the mind is some kind of non-physical supernatural or spiritual entity.

 

Top of the Document

 

TEACH YOURSELF PHILOSOPHY OF MIND, Mel Thompson, Teach Yourself Books, London, 2003